Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

Catalyst Research Center, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

The Dry Reforming of Methane, which uses methane and carbon dioxide, the two greenhouse gasses, to produce synthesis gas, has received considerable attention recently. In this work, the equilibrium conversion that is the maximum possible conversion has been obtained experimentally and theoretically. The equilibrium concentration for the Dry Reforming of Methane (DRM) has been calculated using Thermodynamic equilibrium and compared with the experimental equilibrium concentration. The reaction coordinate (ε), Gibbs free energy (G), reaction equilibrium constant (K), and reaction stoichiometric coefficients are used for the calculation of the reaction progress and the equilibrium composition in DRM at different temperatures. These parameters have been calculated by two primary methods, direct and Lagrange, and compared with an empirical equilibrium that has been revealed by the activity test on Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. The result shows that none of those can’t make an exact determination of empirical equilibrium compositions, but there was a relatively good agreement between the Lagrange method and the empirical equilibrium. No significant difference has been observed between these methods and empirical conditions at high temperature.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  • References

    • Estephane, J., Aouad, S., Hany, S., El Khoury, B., Gennequin, C., El Zakhem, H., El Nakat, J., Aboukaïs, A. and Aad, E. A., “CO2 reforming of methane over Ni–Co/ZSM5 catalysts: Aging and carbon deposition study”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40 (30), 9201 (2015).
    • Majhi, S., Mohanty, P., Wang, H. and Pant, K., “Direct conversion of natural gas to higher hydrocarbons: A review”, Journal of Energy Chemistry, 22 (4), 543 (2013).
    • Usman, M., Daud, W. and Abbas, H. F., “Dry reforming of methane: Influence of process parameters—A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 710 (2015).
    • Palmer, C., Upham, D. C., Smart, S., Gordon, M. J., Metiu, H. and McFarland, E. W., “Dry reforming of methane catalysed by molten metal alloys”, Nature Catalysis, 3 (1), 83 (2020).
    • Bach, V. R., de Camargo, A. C., de Souza, T. L., Cardozo-Filho, L. and Alves, H. J., “Dry reforming of methane over Ni/MgO–Al2O3 catalysts: thermodynamic equilibrium analysis and experimental application”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45 (8), 5252 (2020).
    • Gosiewski, K., “Mathematical simulations of reactors for catalytic conversion of methane to syngas with forced concentration cycling”, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 39 (5), 459 (2000).
    • Hou, K. and Hughes, R., “The kinetics of methane steam reforming over a Ni/α-Al2O3 catalyst”, Chemical Engineering Journal, 82 (1), 311 (2001).
    • Pham, T. P., Ro, K. S., Chen, L., Mahajan, D., Siang, T. J., Ashik, U., Hayashi, J. -I., Minh, D. P. and Vo, D. -V. N., “Microwave-assisted dry reforming of methane for syngas production: A review”, Environmental Chemistry Letters, 1 (2020).
    • Chan, S. and Wang, H., “Thermodynamic analysis of natural-gas fuel processing for fuel cell applications”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 25 (5), 441 (2000).
    • Lutz, A. E., Bradshaw, R. W., Keller, J. O. and Witmer, D. E., “Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 28 (2), 159 (2003).
    • Istadi, I., Amin, N. A. S. and Aishah, N., “Co-generation of C2 hydrocarbons and synthesis gases from methane and carbon dioxide: A thermodynamic analysis”, Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 14 (3), 140 (2005).
    • Douvartzides, S., Coutelieris, F., Demin, A. and Tsiakaras, P., “Fuel options for solid oxide fuel cells: A thermodynamic analysis”, AIChE Journal, 49 (1), 248 (2003).
    • Juan-Juan, J., Román-Martınez, M. and Illán-Gómez, M., “Catalytic activity and characterization of Ni/Al2O3 and NiK/Al2O3 catalysts for CO2 methane reforming”, Applied Catalysis A: General, 264 (2), 169 (2004).
    • Wolf, M., “Thermodynamic assessment of the stability of bulk and nanoparticulate cobalt and nickel during dry and steam reforming of methane”, RSC Advances, 11 (30), 18187 (2021).
    • Abbott, M. M., Smith, J. M. and Van Ness, H. C., Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics, 8th, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, p. 559 (2018).
    • Ahuja, P., Chemical engineering thermodynamics, 1st, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd, (2008).
    • Xia, Y., Wang, S., Shi, C., Xu, J., Xia, R., Xu, H. and Xing, S., “Research progress of thermodynamic simulation for methane dry reforming”, Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, 3 (1), 101 (2020).
    • Abdullah, B., Abd Ghani, N. A. and Vo, D. -V. N., “Recent advances in dry reforming of methane over Ni-based catalysts”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 170 (2017).
    • Sharifi, M., Haghighi, M., Rahmani, F. and Rahemi, N., “Reforming of biogas over Co-and Cu-promoted Ni/Al2O3-ZrO2 nanocatalysts synthesized via sequential impregnation method”, Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment, 1 (1), 53 (2014).
    • Moradi, Gh., Khezeli, F. and Hemmati, H., “Syngas production with dry reforming of methane over Ni/ZSM-5 catalysts”, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 33, 657 (2016).
    • Moradi, Gh., Hemmati, H. and Rahmanzadeh, M., “Preparation of a LaNiO3/γ‐Al2O3 catalyst and its performance in dry reforming of methane”, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 36 (4), 575 (2013).
    • Moradi, Gh., Ahmadpour, J., Nazari, M. and Yaripour, F., “Effects of feed composition and space velocity on direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from syngas”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 47 (20), 7672 (2008).