Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khaje Nasir Toosi University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

MXene membranes perform well in biofuel separation due to their excellent hydrophilicity, flexibility, and mechanical strength. For the first time, computational fluid dynamics was used to model the dehydration of ethanol through the pervaporation system by the MXene membrane. We discretized the momentum and continuity equations using finite element methods and predicted the mass transport. Experimental results and model data were in good agreement (less than 10 %). The feed velocity, feed concentration, and membrane thickness all had positive effects on the separation factors while the temperature had a decreasing effect. This model's efficiency has decreased by 35 % after increasing the feed flow rate by 10 times. In addition, the separation factor increases tenfold when temperature is raised from 25 to 70 °C.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  • References

    • Baker, R. W., Membrane technology and applications, 2nd, John Wiley & sons publication, California, USA, p. 124 (2004).
    • Srikanth, G., “Membrane separation processes: Technology and business opportunities”, Eng. World, 34 (5), 55 (1999).
    • Luis, P., Fundamental modelling of membrane systems: Membrane and process performance, 1st EUROMEMBRANE, (2018). (http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/241732).
    • Wu, Y., Ding, L., Lu, Z., Deng, J. and Wei, Y., “Two-dimensional MXene membrane for ethanol dehydration”, Memb. Sci., 590 (1), 1 (2019). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117300).
    • Xu, Z., Liu, G., Ye, H., Jin, W. and Cui, Z., “Two-dimensional MXene incorporated chitosan mixed-matrix membranes for efficient solvent dehydration”, Memb. Sci., 563 (1), 625 (2018). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.044).
    • Liu, T., Zhou, H., Graham, N., Yu, W. and Sun, K., “2D kaolin ultrafiltration membrane with ultrahigh flux for water purification”, Water Res., 156, 425 (2019). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.050).
    • Liu, G., Hung, W. S., Shen, J., Li, Q., Huang, Y. H., Jin, W.,Lee, K. R. and Lai, J. Y., “Mixed matrix membranes with molecular-interaction-driven tunable free volumes for efficient bio-fuel recovery”, Mater. Chem. A, 3 (8), 4510, (2015). (https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta05881j).
    • Liu, G., Shen, J., Liu, Q., Xiong, G., Yang, J. and Jin, W., “Ultrathin two-dimensional MXene membrane for pervaporation desalination”,” Memb. Sci., 548, 548 (2018). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.065).
    • Srimuk, P., Halim, J., Lee, J., Tao, Q., Rosen, J. and Presser, V., “Two-dimensional molybdenum carbide (MXene) with divacancy ordering for brackish and seawater desalination via cation and anion intercalation”, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 6 (3), 3739 (2018). (https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04095).
    • Naik, P. V., Kerkhofs, S., Martens, J. A. and Vankelecom, I. F. J., “PDMS mixed matrix membranes containing hollow silicalite sphere for ethanol / water separation by pervaporation”, Memb. Sci., 502, 48 (2016). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.028).
    • Azimi, H., Ebneyamini, A., Tezel, F. H. and Thibault, J., “Separation of organic compounds from ABE model solutions via pervaporation using activated carbon/PDMS mixed matrix membranes”, Membranes (Basel)., 8 (3), 1 (2018). (https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030040).
    • Aryafard, E., Rahmatmand, B. and Rahimpour, M. R., “Application of computational fluid dynamics technique in pervaporation processes”, In Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes, 247 (2022). (https://doi.org/1016/B978-0-12-822294-2.00012-6).
    • Wang, J., Gao, X., Ji, G. and Gu, X., “CFD simulation of hollow fiber supported NaA zeolite membrane modules”, Separation and Purification Technology, 213, 1 (2019). (https://doi.org/org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.017).
    • Haddadi, B., Jordan, C., Miltner, M. and Harasek, M., “Membrane modeling using CFD: Combined evaluation of mass transfer and geometrical influences in 1D and 3D”, Journal of Membrane Science, 563, 199 (2018). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.040).
    • Quiroz-Pérez, E., Gutiérrez-Antonio, C. and Vázquez-Román, R., “Modelling of production processes for liquid biofuels through CFD: A review of conventional and intensified technologies”, Eng. Process. - Process Intensif., 143 (2), 107629 (2019). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107629).
    • Rezakazemi, M., Shahverdi, M., Shirazian, S., Mohammadi, T. and Pak, A., “CFD simulation of water removal from water/ethylene glycol mixtures by pervaporation”, Eng. J., 168 (1), 60 (2011). (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.034).
    • Rezakazemi, M., Marjani, A. and Shirazian, S., “Organic solvent removal by pervaporation membrane technology: Experimental and simulation”, Sci. Pollut. Res., 25 (20), 19818 (2018). (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2155-3).
    • She, M. and Hwag, S. T., “Conentration of dilute flavor compounds by pervaporation: Permeate effect and boundary layer resistance modeling”, Member. Sci., 236, 193 (2004).