Document Type : Regular Article


1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

2 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran


The fully mixed continuous stirred tank reactor is an important type of industrial reactors mainly used to produce high volume products such as petrochemicals, detergents, sanitary products and products that are in demand in the market. Knowing the dynamic behavior of chemical reactors is of great importance in setting up, designing, controlling and stopping reactors. In this paper, the effect of non-dimensional numbers Damkohler and Stanton on the stability of a continuous stirred tank reactor in which a first-order exothermic reaction takes place is investigated. First, a mathematical model of the system's dynamic behavior was presented. Then, by simultaneous solving of the equations of mass and energy around the fixed point in MATLAB software, the effect of the mentioned numbers was investigated. The results show that the continuous stirred tank reactor shows different behaviors in different ranges of Damkohler and Stanton numbers. This reactor behaves unstable in small and large ranges of Damkohler and Stanton numbers due to the presence of mixed or positive and negative eigenvalues. The best range for Damkohler and Stanton numbers is close to 1, because in this range the reactor shows stable behavior due to having two negative eigenvalues. In this range, in addition to the stability, the conversion is also 100%. Finaly the ratio of Stanton to DamKohler was investigated as St / Da˃1 and St / Da = 1. If St / Da = 1, the system is in steady state, but in St / Da˃1, the system moves away from steady state.


Main Subjects

  • References

    • Abhinav, S. and Rajiv, K. M., “Control of a nonlinear continuous stirred tank reactor via event triggered sliding modes”, Eng. Sci.,187, 52 (2018).
    • Kahlert, C., Rossler, O. E. and Varms, A., “Chaos in a continuous stirred tank reactor with two cosecutive first-order reaction, one endothermic”, Modeling of chemical reaction systems, Springer- Verlag, 355 (1981).
    • Otálvaro-Marín, H. L. and Machuca-Martínez, F., “Sizing of reactors by charts of Damköhler's number for solutions of dimensionless design equations”, Heliyon, 6 (11), e05386 (2020).
    • Lovo, M. and Balakotaiah, V., “Multiplicity features of adiabatic autothermal reactors”, AIChE J., 38, 101 (1992).
    • Bahmani, E. and Rahmani, M., “An LMI approach to dissipativity-based control of nonlinear systems”, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 357 (10), 5699 (2020).
    • Simorgh, A., Razminia, A. and Vladimir, I. S., “System identification and control design of a nonlinear continuously stirred tank reactor”, Comput. Simul., 173, 16 (2020).
    • Wanotayaroj, T., Chalermsinsuwan, B. and Piumsomboon, P., “Dynamic simulation and control system for chemical looping combustion”, Energy Rep., 6, 32 (2020).
    • Hassanpour, H., Corbett, B. and Mhaskar, P., “Integrating dynamic neural network models with principal component analysis for adaptive model predictive control”, Eng. Res. Des., 161, 26 (2020).
    • Holaza, J., Klaučo, M., Drgoňa, J., Oravec, J., Kvasnica, M. and Fikar, M., “MPC-based reference governor control of a continuous stirred-tank reactor”, Chem. Eng., 108, 289 (2018).
    • Wu, Q., Du, W. and Nagy, Z., “Steady-state target calculation integrating economic optimization for constrained model predictive control”, Chem. Eng., 145, 107 (2021).
    • Khatibi, S., Cassol, G. O. and Dubljevic, S., “Linear model predictive control for a cascade ODE-PDE system,” Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), 4521 (2020).
    • Wahlgreen, M. R., Schroll-Fleischer, E., Boiroux, D., Ritschel T. K. S.,Wu, H., Kjøbsted Huusom, J. and Jørgensen, J. B., “Nonlinear model predictive control for an exothermic reaction in an adiabatic CSTR”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53 (1), 500 (2020).
    • Pipino, H. A., Cappelletti, C. A. and Adam, E. J., “Adaptive multi-model predictive control applied to continuous stirred tank reactor”, Chem. Eng., 145, 107 (2021).
    • Xin, L. P., Yu, B., Zhao, L. and Yu, J., “Adaptive fuzzy backstepping control for a two continuous stirred tank reactors process based on dynamic surface control approach”, Math. Comput., 377, 125 (2020).
    • Wang, G., Jia, Q. -S., Qiao, J., Bi, J. and Zhou, M. C., “Deep learning-based model predictive control for continuous stirred-tank reactor system”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32 (8), 3643 (2020).
    • Baruah, S. and Dewan, L., “A comparative study of PID based temperature control of CSTR using Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization”, Proceedings of International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing and Communication Technologies (ICETCCT), 1 (2017).
    • Wu, Z., Rincon, D. and Christofides, P. D., “Process structure-based recurrent neural network modeling for model predictive control of nonlinear processes”, Process Control, 89, 74 (2020).
    • Jiang, K., Niu, B., Wang, X., Xiang, Z., Li, J., Duan, P. and Yang, D., “Adaptive approximation-based design mechanism for non-strict-feedback nonlinear MIMO systems with application to continuous stirred tank reactor”, ISA Trans., 100, 92 (2020).
    • Zhou, W., Liu, H., He, H., Yi, J. and Li, T., “Neuro-optimal tracking control for continuous stirred tank reactor with input constraints”, IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform., 15, 4516 (2019).
    • Schmitz, R. A., “Multiplicity, stability and sensitivity of state in chemically reacting system- A review”, Chem. Ser., 148, 156 (1975).
    • Vejtasa, S. A. and Schmitz, R. A, “An experimental study of steady state multiplicity and stability in an adiabatic stirred reactor”, AIChE J., 16 (3), 410 (1970).
    • Van Heerden, C., “Autothermic processes”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 45 (6),1242 (1953).
    • Uppal, A., Ray, W. H. and Poore, A. B., “On the dynamic behavior of continuous stirred tank reactors”, Engng. Sci., 29 (4), 967 (1974).
    • Aris, R. and Amundson, N. R., “An analysis of chemical reactor stability and control, II. The evolution of propertional control”, Engng. Sci., 7 (3), 32 (1958).
    • Varma, A. and Aris, R., “Stirred pots and empty tubes”, Chemical reactor theory- A review, Lapidus, L. and Amundson, N. R., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 79 (1977).
    • Vleeschhouwer, P. H. M. and Fortuin, J. M. H, “Theroy and experimental concerning the stability of a reacting system in a CSTR”, AIChE J., 36 (6), 96 (1990).
    • Zaldívar, J. M., Cano, J., Alós, M. A., Sempere, J., Nomen, R., Lister, D., Maschio, D., Obertopp, T., Gilles, E. D., Bosch, J. and Strozzi, F., “A general criterion to define runaway limits in chemical reactors”, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16 (3),187 (2003).