Authors

1 Membrane Research Center, Petroleum And Chemical E

2 Membrane Research Center, Advanced Research Center for Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Ability and compatibility of the membrane processes for gas separation are evaluated by their membranes’ permeability and selectivity where both have been tried to enhance in promising membrane generation of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). In the current study, two- and three-dimensional models were constructed for MMMs, and the Fick's first law was solved numerically in them by using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) tools. The effects of different MMMs structural parameters such as the volume fraction, size and mode of packing, i.e., regular or random, of the filler particles were investigated on the effective permeability of the pure gaseous penetrants through the MMMs. Furthermore, the interfacial equilibrium constant of the penetrants and their diffusivity ratios were also evaluated in view point of their impacts on the MMMs’ separation performance. Some well-known established models including Maxwell, Bruggeman, Lewis - Nielsen, Pal, and Chiew - Glandt were applied in the modeling. Deviation of the simulation results from the experimentally measured ones were low enough, however, at higher loadings of the filler particles the simulation deviation became greater. Simulated results through PSF - MCM-41 MMMs were compared with those of experimentally measured ones and AAREs of 31.0 (The lowest deviation), 42.7, and 41.0 % obtained for CO2, O2, and N2, respectively.

Keywords

  • Baker, R. W., Membrane technology and applications, 2nd, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, p. 96 (2004).
  • Banhegyi, G., “Comparison of electrical mixture rules for composites”, Colloid and Polymer Science, 264 (12), 1030 (1986).
  • Brunetti, A., Scura, F., Barbieri, G. and Drioli, E., “Membrane technologies for CO2 separation”, Journal of Membrane Science, 359 (1-2), 115 (2010).
  • Freeman, B. and Yampolskii, Y., Membrane gas separation, John Wiley & Sons, USA, (2011).
  • Robeson, L. M., “The upper bound revisited”, Journal of Membrane Science, 320 (1-2), 390 (2008).
  • Lin, H., van Wagner, E., Raharjo, R. and Freeman, B. D., “High‐performance polymer membranes for natural‐gas sweetening”, Advanced Materials, 18 (1), 39 (2006).
  • Sen, S. K., Dasgupta, B. and Banerjee, S., “Effect of introduction of heterocyclic moieties into polymer backbone on gas transport properties of fluorinated poly (ether imide) membranes”, Journal of Membrane Science, 343 (1-2), 97 (2009).
  • Ahn, J., Chung, W. -J., Pinnau, I. and Guiver, M. D., “Polysulfone/silica nanoparticle mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation”, Journal of Membrane Science, 314 (1), 123 (2008).
  • Kim, S., Pechar, T. W. and Marand, E., “Poly (imide siloxane) and carbon nanotube mixed matrix membranes for gas separation”, Desalination, 192 (1-3), 330 (2006).
  • Zhang, Y., Balkus, K. J., Musselman, I. H. and Ferraris, J. P., “Mixed-matrix membranes composed of Matrimid® and mesoporous ZSM-5 nanoparticles”, Journal of Membrane Science, 325 (1), 28 (2008).
  • Hosseini, S. F., “Enhanced gas separation performance of nanocomposite membranes using MgO nanoparticles”, Journal of Membrane Science, 302 (1-2), 207 (2007).
  • Kim, S. and Marand, E., “High permeability nano-composite membranes based on mesoporous MCM-41 nanoparticles in a polysulfone matrix”, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 114 (1), 129 (2008).
  • Nik, O. G., Chen, X. Y. and Kaliaguine, S., “Amine-functionalized zeolite FAU/EMT-polyimide mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation”, Journal of Membrane Science, 379 (1), 468 (2011).
  • Aroon, M. A., Ismail, F., Matsuura, T. and Montazer-Rahmati, M. M., “Performance studies of mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: A review”, Separation and Purification Technology, 75 (3), 229 (2010).
  • Chung, T. -S., Jiang, L. Y., Li, Y. and Kulprathipanja, S., “Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation”, Progress in Polymer Science, 32 (4), 48 (2007).
  • Bastani, D., Esmaeili, N. and Asadollahi, M., “Polymeric mixed matrix membranes containing zeolites as a filler for gas separation applications: A review”, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 19 (2), 375 (2013).
  • Mahajan, R., “Formation, characterization and modeling of mixed matrix membrane materials”, University of Texas at Austin, (2000).
  • Maxwell, J., Electricity and magnetism, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, (1873).
  • Bruggeman, D. A. G., “Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. III. Die elastischen Konstanten der quasiisotropen Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen”, Annalen der Physik, 421 (2), 160 (1937).
  • Lewis, T. B. and Nielsen, L. E., “Dynamic mechanical properties of particulate‐filled composites”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 14 (6), 1449 (1970).
  • Pal, R., “New models for thermal conductivity of particulate composites”, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 26 (7), 643 (2007).
  • Chiew, Y. and Glandt, E., “The effect of structure on the conductivity of a dispersion”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 94 (1), 90 (1983).
  • Davis, H., Valencourt, L. and Johnson, C., “Transport processes in composite media”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 58 (9‐10), 446 (1975).
  • Davis, H. T., “The effective medium theory of diffusion in composite media”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 60 (11‐12), 499 (1977).
  • Landauer, R., “The electrical resistance of binary metallic mixtures”, Journal of Applied Physics, 23 (7), 779 (1952).
  • Marand, E. and Surapathi, A., “The role of solubility partition coefficient at the mixed matrix interface in the performance of mixed matrix membranes”, Journal of Membrane Science, 415 (Supplement C), 871 (2012).
  • Singh, T., Kang, D. -Y. and Nair, S., “Rigorous calculations of permeation in mixed-matrix membranes: Evaluation of interfacial equilibrium effects and permeability-based models”, Journal of Membrane Science, 448 (Supplement C), 160 (2013).
  • Gheimasi, K. M., Mohammadi, T. and Bakhtiari, O., “Using a new model for prediction of gas permeability through MMMs: Considering effects of particles shape, polymer chain rigidification, partial pore blockage, and void formation”, Separation Science and Technology, 50 (15), 2384 (2015).
  • Wang, T. -P. and Kang, D. -Y., “Predictions of effective diffusivity of mixed matrix membranes with tubular fillers”, Journal of Membrane Science, 485, 123 (2015).
  • Yang, A. -C., Liu, C. -H. and Kang, D. -Y., “Estimations of effective diffusivity of hollow fiber mixed matrix membranes”, Journal of Membrane Science, 495 (Supplement C), 269 (2015).
  • Monsalve-Bravo, G. M. and Bhatia, S. K., “Extending effective medium theory to finite size systems: Theory and simulation for permeation in mixed-matrix membranes”, Journal of Membrane Science, 531 (Supplement C), 148 (2017).
  • Rajati, H., Bakhtiari, O. and Mohammadi, T., “Molecular modeling of the gaseous penetrants permeabilities through 4A, DDR and silicalite-1 zeolites incorporated in mixed matrix membranes”, Separation Science and Technology, 53 (6), 910 (2018).
  • Tilton, G. J., “Finite element modeling of thermal expansion in polymer/ZrW2O8 composites”, University of Toledo, (2011)
  • Pal, R., “Permeation models for mixed matrix membranes”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 317 (1), 191 (2008).