Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran

2 Amirkabir university of technology (Tehran Polytechnic)

3 Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Rasht branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.

Abstract

Ejectors offer a cost-effective and practical solution for recovering flare gases, thereby reducing greenhouse gases. Improving the entrainment rate of the secondary fluid can enhance ejector performance. The objective of this research is to identify the optimal ejector geometry to maximize the absorption rate of the secondary fluid. Computational fluid dynamics is used to evaluate a two-phase ejector. Geometric parameters such as throat diameter and length, nozzle diameter, and converging and diverging angles impact the absorption rate of the secondary fluid. Using a multi-objective genetic algorithm, the optimal values for each parameter are obtained. The results show that reducing the throat length and angle of the converging section, as well as nozzle diameter, leads to increased absorption. In contrast, the throat and angle of the divergent section increase absorption. Additionally, energy efficiency is investigated under basic and optimized geometries. The findings reveal that increasing the soak range does not necessarily enhance energy efficiency.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  • Emam, E. A., “Gas flaring in industry: An overview”, Petroleum & Coal, 57 (5), 532 (2015).
  • Soltanieh, M., Zohrabian, A., Gholipour, M. J. and Kalnay, E., “A review of global gas flaring and venting and impact on the environment: Case study of Iran”, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 49, 488 (2016).
  • Davoudi, M., Rahimpour, R., Jokar, S. M., Nikbakht, F. and Abbasfard, H., “The major sources of gas flaring and air contamination in the natural gas processing plants: A case study”, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 13, 7 (2013).
  • Elhagar, M., El-Emam, N., Awad, M., Ahmed, A. Z. and Aboul-Fotouh, T. M., “Increase flared gas recovery and emission reduction by separator optimization”, International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 12 (1), 115 (2021).
  • Rahimpour, M., Jamshidnejad, Z., Jokar, S., Karimi, G., Ghorbani, A. and Mohammadi, A., “A comparative study of three different methods for flare gas recovery of Asalooye Gas Refinery”, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 4, 17 (2012).
  • Sangsaraki, M. E. and Anajafi, E., “Design criteria and simulation of flare gas recovery system”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Chemical, Food and Environment Engineering (ICCFEE’15), Dubai, UAE, 15, 11 (2015).
  • Zolfaghari, M., Pirouzfar, V. and Sakhaeinia, H., “Technical characterization and economic evaluation of recovery of flare gas in various gas-processing plants”, Energy, 124, 481 (2017).
  • Hajizadeh, A., Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, M., Azin, R., Osfouri, S. and Heydari, I., “Technical and economic evaluation of flare gas recovery in a giant gas refinery”,Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 131, 506 (2018).
  • Hamidzadeh, Z., Sattari, S., Soltanieh, M. and Vatani, A., “Development of a multi-objective decision-making model to recover flare gases in a multi flare gases zone”, Energy, 203, 117815 (2020).
  • Mousavi, S. M., Lari, K., Salehi, G. and Torabi Azad, M., “Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of flare gas recovery system: A case study”, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 9 (1),1 (2020).
  • Xue, M., Li, X., Cui, X., Cheng, X., Liu, S., Xu, W. and Wang, Y., “A pilot demonstration of flaring gas recovery during shale gas well completion in china”, SPE Prod. & Oper., 38 (3), 504 (2023).
  • Khalili-Garakani, A., Nezhadfard, M. and Iravaninia, M., “Enviro-economic investigation of various flare gas recovery and utilization technologies in upstream and downstream of oil and gas industries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 131218 (2022).
  • Zaresharif, M., Vatani, A. and Ghasemian, M., “Evaluation of different flare gas recovery alternatives with exergy and exergoeconomic analyses”, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47, 1 (2021).
  • Leagas, T., Seefeldt, G. and Hoon, D., “Ejector technology for efficient and cost effective flare gas recovery”, Proceedings of GPA-GCC 24th Annual Technical Conference, Kuwait City [online], (2016).
  • Ainge, P., “Ejector technology for flare gas recovery as an alternative to rotating equipment”, Proceedings of Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (SPE), (2019).
  • Mazumder, M., Chen, L. and Xu, Q., “Integrated ejector‐based flare gas recovery and on‐site desalination of produced water in Shale gas production”, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 43 (2), 200 (2020).
  • Eshaghi, S. and Hamrang, F., “An innovative techno-economic analysis for the selection of an integrated ejector system in the flare gas recovery of a refinery plant”, Energy, 228, 120594 (2021).
  • Bashiri, H., Ashrafi, O. and Navarri, P., “Energy-efficient process designs of integrated biomass-derived syngas purification processes via waste heat recovery and integration of ejector technology”, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 106, 103259 (2021).
  • Ainge, P. and Al-Khateeb, E., “Selection and evaluation of ejectors for flare gas recovery and upstream/midstream gas compression applications”, Proceedings of International Petroleum Technology Conference, (2022).
  • Galanis, N. and Sorin, M., “Ejector design and performance prediction”, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 104, 315 (2016).
  • Wang, L., Yan, J., Wang, C. and Li, X., “Numerical study on optimization of ejector primary nozzle geometries”, International Journal of Refrigeration, 76, 219 (2017).
  • Śmierciew, K., Gagan, J. and Butrymowicz, D., “Application of numerical modelling for design and improvement of performance of gas ejector”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 149, 85 (2019).
  • Suvarnakuta, N., Pianthong, K., Sriveerakul, T. and Seehanam, W., “Performance analysis of a two-stage ejector in an ejector refrigeration system using computational fluid dynamics”, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 14 (1), 669 (2020).
  • Li, H., Wang, X., Ning, J., Zhang, P., Huang, H. and Tu, J., “Numerical investigation of the nozzle expansion state and its effect on the performance of the steam ejector based on ideal gas model”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 199, 117509 (2021).
  • Xu, J., Liu, X. and Pang, M., “Numerical and experimental studies on transport properties of powder ejector based on double venturi effect”, Vacuum, 134, 92 (2016).
  • Sriveerakul, T., Aphornratana, S. and Chunnanond, K., “Performance prediction of steam ejector using computational fluid dynamics: Part 1, Validation of the CFD results”, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46 (8), 812 (2007).
  • Yadav, R. L. and Patwardhan, A. W., “Design aspects of ejectors: Effects of suction chamber geometry”, Chemical Engineering Science, 63 (15), (2008).
  • Ariyaratne, W. H., Manjula, E. V. P. J., Ratnayake, C. and Melaaen, M. C., “CFD approaches for modeling gas-solids multiphase flows–A review”, Proceedings of 9th EUROSIM, The 57th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2016, Linköping University Electronic Press, 142, 680 (2018).
  • Suh, J. W., Kim, J. W., Choi, Y. S., Kim, J. H., Joo, W. G. and Lee, K. Y., “Development of numerical Eulerian-Eulerian models for simulating multiphase pumps”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 162, 588 (2018).
  • Song, X., Cao, M., Shin, W., Cao, W., Kang, S. and Park, Y., “Numerical investigation of a liquid-gas ejector used for shipping ballast water treatment”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, (2014).
  • Alshebani, M. E., Alawadhi., K., Alnaqi, A. A. and Saker, A. A., “Numerical investigation of a liquid-gas ejector in marine ships”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12 (14), 4663 (2017).
  • Parekh, J. and Rzehak, R., “Euler–Euler multiphase CFD-simulation with full Reynolds stress model and anisotropic bubble-induced turbulence”, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 99, 231 (2018).
  • Kwiatoń, P., Cekus, D., Miara, M. and Kubik-Maciąg, I., “Multiphase modeling of droplet fall using Euler-Euler approach”, Acta Physica Polonica A, 138 (2), 276 (2020).
  • Frank, T., Zwart, P., Krepper, E., Prasser, H. M. and Lucas, D., “Validation of CFD models for mono-and polydisperse air–water two-phase flows in pipes”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 238 (3), 647 (2008).
  • Selvakumar, R. D. and Dhinakaran, S., “Forced convective heat transfer of nanofluids around a circular bluff body with the effects of slip velocity using a multi-phase mixture model”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 106, 816 (2017).
  • Manninen, M., Taivassalo, V. and Kallio, S., “On the mixture model for multiphase flow”, Technical Research Center of Finland, VTT Publications, (1996).
  • Bhutada, S. and Pangarkar, V., “Gas induction and hold-up characteristics of liquid jet loop reactors”, Chemical Engineering Communications, 61 (1-6), 239 (1987).
  • Ringstad, K. E., Allouche, Y., Gullo, P., Ervik, Å., Banasiak, K. and Hafner, A., “A detailed review on CO2 two-phase ejector flow modeling”, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 20, 100647 (2020).
  • De Oliveira Marum, V. J., Reis, L. B., Maffei, F. S., Ranjbarzadeh, S., Korkischko, I., dos Santos Gioria, R. and Meneghini, J. R., “Performance analysis of a water ejector using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and mathematical modeling”, Energy, 220, 119779 (2021).
  • Zolpakar, N. A., Lodhi, S. S., Pathak, S. and Sharma, M. A., “Application of multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) optimization in machining processes”, Optimization of Manufacturing Processes, Springer, p. 1-15 (2020).
  • Murata, T. and Ishibuchi, H., “MOGA: multi-objective genetic algorithms”, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, NJ, USA, (1995).
  • Deb, K., “Multi-objective genetic algorithms: Problem difficulties and construction of test problems”, Evolutionary Computation, 7 (3), 205 (1999).