Impact of Liquid-Liquid Hydrodynamic Focusing on the Efficiency of Heterogeneous Microreactors: Numerical Solution

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kashan, P. O. Box 87317-51167, Kashan, Iran

2 Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Research Lab., Chemical Engineering Dep., Engineering Faculty, University of Kashan

Abstract
Most of the reactions that occur in microreactors take place on the surface, so it is important to keep the reactants close to the reactive wall. One effective technique in this field is the single-phase hydrodynamic focusing. However, this method has a drawback: a high percentage of reactants penetrate into the sheath fluid. To address this issue, the concept of the two-phase hydrodynamic focusing is introduced in this study. The main idea is to use a highly viscous sheath fluid to create a barrier against reactant penetration into the sheath flow. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this method, a 3D numerical simulation was performed with an irreversible second-order reaction. The results show that the two-phase hydrodynamic focusing increases reaction rates, particularly in downstream regions where the Sherwood number can increase by several orders of magnitude with the use of a highly viscous sheath of liquids. Additionally, it was observed that the use of the two-phase hydrodynamic focusing improves the efficiency, which is defined as the ratio of the solute in the sample flow to the total solute in each cross-section..

Keywords

Subjects


[1] Raji, F., Kahani, A., Sahabi, M., Rahbar-kalishami, A., & Padrela, L. (2023). Investigating the effectiveness of the main channel in microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction process. International Commun-ications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 147, 106986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106986.
[2] Wong, W. D., Majnis, M. F., Lai, C. W., Sagadevan, S., & Julkapli, N. M. (2024). Enhancement of mixing and reaction efficiency of various fluids applications at different microfluidic configuration and design. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 109729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2024.109729.
[3] Kazemi, Y., Sadeghi, A., & Irankhah, A. (2022). Increasing the efficiency of microreactors utilizing two-phase hydrodynamic focusing. Chemical Engineering Science, 264, 118188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.118188.
[4] Buttkewitz, M. A., Heuer, C., & Bahnemann, J. (2023). Sensor integration into microfluidic systems: trends and challenges. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 83, 102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2023.102978
[5] Riahi, R., Tamayol, A., Shaegh, S. A. M., Ghaemmaghami, A. M., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A. (2015). Microfluidics for advanced drug delivery systems. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 7, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR02397C.
[6] Lee, B., Kim, M., Oh, S., Lee, D. B., Lee, S. G., Kim, H. M., ... & Lee, C. S. (2023). Characterization of passive microfluidic mixer with a three-dimensional zig-zag channel for cryo-EM sampling. Chemical Engineering Science, 281, 119161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.119161.
[7] Golden, J. P., Justin, G. A., Nasir, M., & Ligler, F. S. (2012). Hydrodynamic focusing—a versatile tool. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 402, 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5415-3.
[8] Wu, B., Xu, X., Dong, G., Zhang, M., Luo, S., Leung, D. Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). Computational modeling studies on microfluidic fuel cell: A prospective review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 191, 114082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114082.
[9] Yang, J., Ghobadian, S., Goodrich, P. J., Montazami, R., & Hashemi, N. (2013). Miniaturized biological and electrochemical fuel cells: challenges and applications. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 15(34), 14147-14161. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP50804H.
[10] Yoon, S. K., Choban, E. R., Kane, C., Tzedakis, T., & Kenis, P. J. (2005). Laminar flow-based electrochemical microreactor for efficient regeneration of nicotinamide cofactors for biocatalysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127(30), 10466-10467. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja052613n.
[11] Yang, J., Ghobadian, S., Goodrich, P. J., Montazami, R., & Hashemi, N. (2013). Miniaturized biological and electrochemical fuel cells: challenges and applications. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 15(34), 14147-14161. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP50804H.
[12] Chen, Y., Guo, K., Jiang, L., Zhu, S., Ni, Z., & Xiang, N. (2023). Microfluidic deformability cytometry: A review. Talanta, 251, 123815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123815.
[13] Jia, J., Zhu, Z., Chen, H., Pan, H., Jiang, L., Su, W. H., ... & Yu, K. (2023). Full life circle of micro-nano bubbles: Generation, characterization and applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 144621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144621.
[14] Stavrakis, S., Holzner, G., Choo, J., & DeMello, A. (2019). High-throughput microfluidic imaging flow cytometry. Current opinion in biotechnology, 55, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2018.08.002.
[15] Xie, X., Gong, M., Zhang, Z., Dou, X., Zhou, W., Li, J., ... & Xu, X. (2022). Optimization of an electrical impedance flow cytometry system and analysis of submicron particles and bacteria. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 360, 131432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.131432.
[16] Sadeghi, A., Amini, Y., Saidi, M. H., & Chakraborty, S. (2014). Numerical modeling of surface reaction kinetics in electrokinetically actuated microfluidic devices. Analytica chimica acta, 838, 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2014.05.023
[17] Hardt, S., Doffing, F., & Pennemann, H. (2002). Simulation of hydrodynamic dispersion in gas/liquid microreactors. Nanotech, 1, 54-57.
[18] Yoon, S. K., Choban, E. R., Kane, C., Tzedakis, T., & Kenis, P. J. (2005). Laminar flow-based electrochemical microreactor for efficient regeneration of nicotinamide cofactors for biocatalysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127(30), 10466-10467. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja052613n.