Investigation of Operation Life on Catalyst of Acetylene Hydrogenation Reactor – An Industrial Study

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

Petroleum University of Technology

Abstract
The study examines the operational lifespan and catalytic efficiency of the acetylene hydrogenation reactor at Amirkabir Petrochemical Company in Iran, a critical component in industrial olefin production. Acetylene, an undesirable by-product in olefin synthesis, adversely impacts profitability and polymer product quality. To mitigate these effects, the acetylene concentration in the feed stream must be reduced to below 0.5 ppm through catalytic hydrogenation. However, excessive conversion leads to ethane production, thereby reducing ethylene yield. This research uses a modeling approach, supported by industrial data, to investigate the reactor’s behavior under various conditions. A major focus is placed on the reaction kinetics to optimize operational parameters and minimize ethane production, which is less desirable than ethylene. The analysis includes key variables such as temperature, pressure, and the hydrogen-to-hydrocarbon ratio. Moving average method was used to smoothing 78 operational data in this work. Results showed the average absolute selectivity is less than 10%. Additionally, the study evaluates the role of carbon monoxide (CO) as a selective agent that enhances ethylene yield while reducing operational risks. The results showed that the main conversion takes place in the beginning of the reaction (first 1 m of the bed). Additionally, findings indicate that optimal management of these parameters can greatly improve reaction selectivity and the efficiency of the hydrogenation process. The results provide significant insights for refining practices in acetylene hydrogenation, suggesting strategies for improving product quality and operational efficiency in the petrochemical industry.

Keywords

Subjects


[1] Emergen-Research (2023) Olefin market industry overview. Emergen Research. Available from: https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/olefins-market.
[2] Amghizar I, Vandewalle L.A, Van Geem K.M, Marin G.B (2017) New trends in olefin production. Engineering 3(2):171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.02.006.
[3] G Gobbo R, Soares R.P, Lansarin M, Secchi A.R (2004) Modeling, simulation, and optimization of a front-end system for acetylene hydrogenation reactors. Braz J Chem Eng 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322004000400004.
[4] Khusainov R.R, Solovev S.A, Soloveva O.V, Ilyasov I.R (2020) Numerical simulation and experimental study of the acetylene hydrogenation reaction. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 734:012205. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/734/1/012205.
[5] Takht Ravanchi M, Sahebdelfar S, Komeili S (2018) Acetylene selective hydrogenation: a technical review on catalytic aspects. Rev Chem Eng 34(2):215–237.
[6] Xie K, Xu K, Liu M, Song X, Xu S, Si H (2023) Catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene: A review. Mater Today Catal 3:100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcata.2023.100029
[7] Tafete G.A, Habtu N.G (2023) Reactor configuration, operations and structural catalyst design in process intensification of catalytic reactors: A review. Chem Eng Process 184:109290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2023.109290
[8] Rijo B, Lemos F, Fonseca I, Vilelas A (2019) Development of a model for an industrial acetylene hydrogenation reactor using plant data – Part I. Chem Eng J 379:122390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122390
[9] Bond G, Dowden D, Mackenzie N (1958) The selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Trans Faraday Soc 54:1537–1546.
[10] Boudart M, Djéga-Mariadassou K (1984) Kinetics of Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[11] Trimm D.L (1988) The steam reforming of natural gas: Problems and some solutions. Stud Surf Sci Catal 36:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(09)60498-5
[12] Froment G.F (1990) Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[13] Bos A.N.R, Botsma E.S, Foeth F, Sleyster H.W.J, Westerterp K.R (1993) A kinetic study of the hydrogenation of ethyne and ethene on a commercial Pd/Al₂O₃ catalyst. Chem Eng Process 32(1):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0255-2701(93)87006-G
[14] Schbib N.S, Garcia M.A, Gigola C.E, Errazu A.F (1996) Kinetics of front-end acetylene hydrogenation in ethylene production. Ind Eng Chem Res 35(5):1496–1502. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie950600k
[15] Borodziński A, Cybulski A (2000) The kinetic model of hydrogenation of acetylene–ethylene mixtures over palladium surface covered by carbonaceous deposits. Appl Catal A 198(1–2):51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00498-6
[16] McCue A.J, Anderson J.A (2015) Recent advances in selective acetylene hydrogenation using palladium containing catalysts. Front Chem Sci Eng 9(2):142–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1516-4
[17] Rötzer M.D, Krause M, Hinke T, Bertrang K, Schweinberger F.F, Crampton A.S, Heiz U (2024) Same size, same support, same spectator? Selective acetylene hydrogenation on supported Pd nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CP00719K
[18] Peng D.-Y, Robinson D.B (1976) A new two-constant equation of state. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 15(1):59–64.
[19] Holman J.P (2009) Heat Transfer. Series in Mechanical Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York.