Techno-Economic Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Plastic Waste using Aspen HYSYS

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Western University, London, N6G 0N1, ON, Canada

Abstract
The rapid growth in global demand for clean and sustainable energy has intensified the need for efficient hydrogen (H2) production technologies. Thermochemical recycling of plastic waste has emerged as a promising approach, offering both environmental benefits and the generation of high-purity, low-carbon H2. This study evaluates the technical and economic feasibility of H2 production from diverse plastic waste streams using Aspen HYSYS and the Aspen Economic Analyzer. The process integrates polymer pyrolysis, chlorine removal, and steam reforming. Feedstocks (200×10³ t/y) include polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and mixed industrial and municipal waste from packaging (PKG), medical (MED), automotive (AUT), municipal solid waste (MSW), construction (CON), and textile (TEX) sectors. H2 production yield strongly depends on the feedstock composition, ranging from 0.14 to 0.31 t H₂/t feed. PET with the lowest H/C ratio, exhibits the lowest yield, whereas PE and PP achieve the highest yields, albeit with incomplete carbon-to-CO conversion. Oxygenated polymers, such as PET, generate the highest CO2 emissions (~1.4 t/t feed). Economic analysis indicates that PE and MED are the most cost-effective feedstocks, with gross margins of 62 and 66% and annual net profits of 232×10⁶ and 223×10⁶ USD, respectively.

Keywords


[1] Pieroni V (2023) Energy Shortages and Aggregate Demand: Output Loss and Unequal Burden from HANK. European Economic Review 154: 104428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104428.
[2] Boretti A, Pollet BG (2024) Hydrogen Economy: Paving the Path to a Sustainable, Low-Carbon Future. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 93: 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.350.
[3] Kibria MdG, Masuk NI, Safayet R, Nguyen HQ, Mourshed M (2023) Plastic Waste: Challenges and Opportunities to Mitigate Pollution and Effective Management. International Journal of Environmental Research 17: 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z.
[4] Yi CQ, Haji Bojeng MNBHB, Haji Kamis SKB, Mubarak NM, Karri RR, Azri H (2024) Production of Hydrogen Using Plastic Waste Via Aspen Hysys Simulation. Scientific Reports 14: 4934. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55079-5.
[5] Chen Z, Wei W, Chen X, Liu Y, ShenY, Ni B-J (2024) Upcycling of plastic wastes for hydrogen production: Advances and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 195, 114333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114333.
[6] Han DG, Erdem K, Midilli A )2023( Investigation of Hydrogen Production Via Waste Plastic Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor Using Aspen Plus. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 99: 39315-39329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.038.
[7] Natesakhawat S, Weidman J, Means NC, Howard BH, Shi F, Lekse J, Gray MM, Wang P (2025) Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Production from the Steam Co-Gasification of Low-Density Polyethylene and Coal Refuse. Fuel 395: 135254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135254.
[8] Cudjoe D, Zhu B (2024) Gasification of Medical Plastic Waste into Hydrogen: Energy Potential, Environmental Benefits and Economic Feasibility. Fuel 371: 132150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132150.
[9] Zhang B, Zhang H, Pan Y, Shao J, Wang X, Jiang Y, Xu X, Chu S (2023) Photoelectrochemical Conversion of Plastic Waste into High-Value Chemicals Coupling Hydrogen Production. Chemical Engineering Journal 462: 142247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142247
[10] Suarez MA, Januszewicz K, Cortazar M, Lopez G, Santamaria L, Olazar M, Artetxe M, Amutio M (2024) Selective H2 Production from Plastic Waste through Pyrolysis and in-Line Oxidative Steam Reforming. Energy 302: 131762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131762.
[11] Cortazar M, Gao N, Quan C, Suarez MA, Lopez G, Orozco S, Santamaria L, Amutio M, Olazar M (2022) Analysis of Hydrogen Production Potential from Waste Plastics by Pyrolysis and in Line Oxidative Steam Reforming. Fuel Processing Technology 225: 107044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.107044.
[12] Medaiyese FJ, Nasriani HR, Khan K, Khajenoori L (2025) Sustainable Hydrogen Production from Plastic Waste: Optimizing Pyrolysis for a Circular Economy. Hydrogen, 6: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6010015.
[13] AlNouss A, Parthasarathy P, Shahbaz M, Al-Ansari T, Mackey H, McKay G. (2020) Techno-Economic and Sensitivity Analysis of Coconut Coir pith-Biomass Gasification using ASPEN PLUS. Applied Energy 261: 114350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114350.
[14] Almpantis D, Zabaniotou A (2021) Technological Solutions and Tools for Circular Bioeconomy in Low-Carbon Transition: Simulation Modeling of Rice Husks Gasification for CHP by Aspen PLUS V9 and Feasibility Study by Aspen Process Economic Analyzer. Energies 14: 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14072006.
[15] Alshareef R, SaitStewart R, Nahil MA, Williams PT (2024) Threestage PyrolysisSteam ReformingWater Gas Shift Processing of Household, Commercial and Industrial Waste Plastics for Hydrogen Production. Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy 6: 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-023-00173-z.
[16] Meng H, Liu J, Xia Y, Hu B, Sun H, Li J, Lu Q (2024) Migration and Transformation Mechanism of Cl During Polyvinyl Chloride Pyrolysis: The Role of Structural Defects. Polymer Degradation and Stability 224: 110750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2024.110750.
[17] Hernandez G, Low J (2024) Quantifying and Managing plastic Waste Generated from Building Construction in Auckland, New Zealand. Sage Journals 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X221105425.
[20] Bodzay B, Bánhegyi G (2017) Polymer Waste: Controlled Breakdown or Recycling? International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology 22: 109-138. ISSN 1630 -7267.