Enhanced Manufacturing of Small Vessel Hulls: Numerical Insights into Resin Infusion Techniques

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

School of Chemical Engineering, Iran University of Science and technology, 16846-13114, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/ijche.2026.579774.1590
Abstract
Liquid Composite Molding (LCM), particularly the Resin Infusion (RI) process, has become an attractive manufacturing technique for producing lightweight composite vessel hulls with improved structural performance and reduced production costs. Nevertheless, achieving rapid and uniform resin impregnation while preventing dry spots and premature gelation remains a major challenge. This study presents a numerical investigation of resin flow behavior in the manufacturing of small composite vessel hulls using a two-phase computational fluid dynamics model based on the Level-Set Method. Five resin injection configurations, including cylindrical, fishbone, radial, parallel, and alternating arrangements, were systematically evaluated in terms of resin flow pattern, filling time, pressure distribution, and gelation behavior. The numerical model was validated against an analytical gelation-time correlation, resulting in prediction errors of only 2.60% for the cylindrical configuration and 1.35% for the fishbone configuration. Compared with the conventional cylindrical arrangement, the fishbone configuration reduced the gelation time from 127 min to 96 min, corresponding to an improvement of approximately 24%, while achieving complete mold filling before gelation. Among all investigated strategies, the alternating and radial configurations exhibited the shortest filling times of approximately 30 min and 35 min, respectively, whereas the parallel configuration required nearly 120 min. Furthermore, the cylindrical configuration filled only about 90% of the mold before gelation. The results demonstrate that optimized inlet configurations significantly improve resin distribution uniformity, reduce filling time, and enhance manufacturing efficiency, providing practical guidelines for the design and optimization of resin infusion processes for composite marine structures.

Keywords

Subjects

[1] Arora H, Kelly M, Worley A, Del Linz P, Fergusson A, Hooper P, Dear J (2014) Compressive strength after blast of sandwich composite materials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 372: 20130212.
[2] Lee H, Jung K, Park H (2021) Study on structural design and analysis of composite boat hull manufactured by resin infusion simulation. Materials 14: 5918.
[3] Verma KK, Dinesh B, Singh K, Gaddikeri KM, Sundaram R (2014) Challenges in processing of a cocured wing test box using vacuum enhanced resin infusion technology (VERITy). Procedia Materials Science 6: 331-340.
[4] Teixeira TA, Souza JA (2019) Computational modeling of resin infusion process applied to small vessel hulls. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 41: 1-9.
[5] Mathijsen D (2016) Now is the time to make the change from metal to composites in naval shipbuilding. Reinforced Plastics 60: 289-293.
[6] Gromada M, Świeca A, Kostecki M, Olszyna A, Cygan R (2015) Ceramic cores for turbine blades via injection moulding. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 220: 107-112.
[7] Michaud V (2016) A review of non-saturated resin flow in liquid composite moulding processes. Transport in Porous Media 115: 581-601.
[8] Ageyeva T, Sibikin I, Kovács JG (2019) A review of thermoplastic resin transfer molding: Process modeling and simulation. Polymers 11: 1555.
[9] Agwa M, Youssef SM, Ali-Eldin SS, Megahed M (2022) Integrated vacuum assisted resin infusion and resin transfer molding technique for manufacturing of nano-filled glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite. Journal of Industrial Textiles 51: 5113S-5144S.
[10] Bodaghi M, Costa R, Gomes R, Silva J, Correia N, Silva F (2020) Experimental comparative study of the variants of high-temperature vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding. Elsevier 105708
[11] Delucis RDA, Tonatto MLP, Trindade RS, Amico SC (2021) In situ L-RTM manufacturing of sandwich panels with PET foam core reinforced by polymeric pins. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials 23: 241-254.
[12] Vita A, Castorani V, Germani M, Marconi M (2019) Comparative life cycle assessment of low-pressure RTM, compression RTM and high-pressure RTM manufacturing processes to produce CFRP car hoods. Procedia CIRP 80: 352-357.
[13] Govignon Q, Bickerton S, Kelly P (2023) Liquid composite molding processes. In: Advanced Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Structural Applications. Elsevier, pp. 101-136.
[14] Hassan MH (2021) A mini review on manufacturing defects and performance assessments of complex shape prepreg-based composites. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 115: 3393-3408.
[15] Bo Y, Shilong W, Qian T (2019) Modeling and 3D simulation of the mould compression and resin flow for force-controlled compression resin transfer moulding. Materials Science (Medžiagotyra) 25.
 [16] Härter FV, Souza JA, Isoldi LA, Santos EDD, Amico SC (2017) Transverse permeability determination and influence in resin flow through an orthotropic medium in the RTM process. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro) 22: e11851.
[17] Magagnato D, Seuffert J, Bernath A, Kärger L, Henning F (2018) Experimental and numerical study of the influence of integrated load transmission elements on filling behavior in resin transfer molding. Composite Structures 198: 135-143.
[18] Yang W, Lu S, Xiang L, Liu W (2019) Nonisothermal simulation on pressure during resin transfer molding. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 136: 47492.
[19] Koutsonas S (2018) Modelling race-tracking variability of resin rich zones on 90 composite 2.2 twill fibre curved plate. Composites Science and Technology 168: 448-459.
[20] Mustafa I (1998) A 3-D nonisothermal flow simulation and pulling force model for injection pultrusion processes. Washington University in St. Louis.
[21] Souza JA, Rocha LAO, Amico SC, Vargas JVC (2011) A numerical investigation of the resin flow front tracking applied to the RTM process. Materials Research 14: 345-354.
[22] Rubino F (2018) Analysis and enhancement of resin flow in liquid composite molding process. 
[23] Torrent RJ, Neves RD, Imamoto K-I (2021) Concrete permeability and durability performance: From theory to field applications. CRC Press.
[24] Isoldi LA, Oliveira CP, Rocha LA, Souza JA, Amico SC (2012) Three-dimensional numerical modeling of RTM and LRTM processes. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 34: 105-111.
[25] Joubaud L, Achim V, Trochu F (2005) Numerical simulation of resin infusion and reinforcement consolidation under flexible cover. Polymer Composites 26: 417-427.
[26] Correia N, Robitaille F, Long A, Rudd C, Šimáček P, Advani S (2005) Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. Analytical formulation. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 36: 1645-1656.
[27] Trochu F, Ruiz E, Achim V, Soukane S (2006) Advanced numerical simulation of liquid composite molding for process analysis and optimization. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 37: 890-902.
[28] Govignon Q, Bickerton S, Kelly P (2010) Simulation of the reinforcement compaction and resin flow during the complete resin infusion process. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 41: 45-57.
[29] Adhikari D, Gururaja S, Hemchandra S (2021) Vacuum infusion in porous preform with different mould configurations: Flow simulation and experimental validation. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 40: 321-338.
[30] Adhikari D, Gururaja S, Hemchandra S, Kočí J (2023) Resin infusion in porous preform in the presence of HPM considering complex geometry and gravity: Flow simulation and experimental validation. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 42: 971-989.
[31] Li C, Huang J, Qin T, Chen C, Gao L, Xu J (2022) A novel approach to simulate the resin infusion process by two phases coupling free and porous flows intra and inter fiber tows of liquid composite molding. Journal of Composite Materials 56: 3359-3367.
[32] do Nascimento Santos M, Delgado JM, Barbosa de Lima A, Rodrigues I (2019) Resin flow in porous-fibrous media: An application to polymer composite manufacturing. Diffusion Foundations 20: 1-15.
[33] Sandberg M, Yuksel O, Baran I, Hattel JH, Spangenberg J (2021) Numerical and experimental analysis of resin-flow, heat-transfer, and cure in a resin-injection pultrusion process. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 143: 106231.
[34] Lu JG, Lee SB, Lundström TS, Hwang WR (2022) Numerical simulation on void formation and migration using Stokes-Brinkman coupling with effective dual-scale fibrous porous media. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 152: 106683.
[35] Mirjalili S, Ivey CB, Mani A (2020) A conservative diffuse interface method for two-phase flows with provable boundedness properties. Journal of Computational Physics 401: 109006.
[36] Bariki SG, Movahedirad S (2022) A flow map for core/shell microdroplet formation in the co-flow microchannel using ternary phase-field numerical model. Scientific Reports 12: 22010
[37] Bariki SG, Movahedirad S (2023) Hydrodynamic characteristics of core/shell microdroplets formation: Map of the flow patterns in double-T microchannel. Chemical Engineering Journal: 147749.
[38] Ghasemzade Bariki S, Salman M, Movahedirad S (2023) Computational fluid dynamic study of polycaprolactone nanoparticles precipitation in a co-flow capillary micro-tube. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 101: 4746-4761.
[39] Mahmoudi M, Bariki SG, Movahedirad S (2024) Comprehensive analysis and CFD modeling of slug and detachment length in the T-junction micro-channel using RSM.
[40] Vilà J, González C, Llorca J (2014) A level set approach for the analysis of flow and compaction during resin infusion in composite materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 67: 299-307

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 05 July 2026