Enhancing Water Flooding Efficiency in Carbonate Oil Reservoirs through Controlled Imbibition and Mobility using a Combination of Smart Water and Polymer Flooding

Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

1 School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

10.22034/ijche.2026.585050.1596
Abstract
To enhance the efficiency of oil recovery, a combination of multiple methods or materials can be utilized. This study aimed to investigate a hybrid method of using smart water and polymers to improve water flooding. Moreover, in this paper the influence of sulfate on the performance of polymers for increasing the efficiency of this method is investigated. To this end, we examine mechanisms, including changes in viscosity and interfacial tension (IFT), affecting oil recovery. To assess the impact of the injected fluid on oil recovery, a micro-model consisting of sand packs prepared from carbonate rock grains was employed as a two-dimensional simulated porous medium. The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Central Composite Design (CCD) were used as the most precise methods to design the experiments. The design was based on five levels and three variables including three parameters of the concentration of polymers ranging from 1000 to 3000 ppm, the concentration of the ions of smart water ranging from 12210 to 54180 ppm, and the temperature of 25–75°C. Considering the defined conditions, the effects of the prepared compositions on viscosity, IFT, and oil recovery were evaluated. The highest final oil recovery obtained, for the polymer-smart water without the NaCl (Sw-NaCl) solution, was reported about 60.32% of oil originally in place (OOIP), while the lowest one was reported to be about 50.67% of OOIP.

Keywords

Subjects

[1] Gao CH (2011) Advances of polymer flood in heavy oil recovery. In: SPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, SPE-150384. SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/150384-MS
[2] Amirian E, Dejam M, Chen Z (2018) Performance forecasting for polymer flooding in heavy oil reservoirs. Fuel 216:83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.110
[3] Pitts MJ, Campbell TA, Surkalo H, Wyatt K (1995) Polymer flood of the Rapdan pool. SPE Reserv Eng 10(3):183–186. https://doi.org/10.2118/27820-PA
[4] Wang D, Wang G, Wu W, Xia H, Yin H (2007) The influence of viscoelasticity on displacement efficiency—from micro-to macroscale. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-109016. SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/109016-MS
[5] Yin S (2020) Evaluation of EOR potential of low salinity polymer in enhancing heavy oil recovery on the Alaska North Slope. Missouri University of Science and Technology.
[6] Ayirala S, AlSofi A, AlYousef Z, Wang J, Alsaud MA, AlYousef A (2022) SmartWater based synergistic technologies for enhanced oil recovery. Fuel 316:123264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123264
[7] Wang J, Ayirala SC, Sofi A, Yousef A (2024) Synergistic SmartWater based surfactant polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery in carbonates. Pet Sci Technol 42(6):659–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2022.2131820
[8] Kakati A, Kumar G, Sangwai JS (2020) Low salinity polymer flooding: effect on polymer rheology, injectivity, retention, and oil recovery efficiency. Energy Fuels 34(5):5715–5732. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00393
[9] Darvish Sarvestani A, Rostami B, Mahani H (2021) Polymer-enhanced low-salinity brine to control in situ mixing and salt dispersion in low-salinity waterflooding. Energy Fuels 35(13):10540–10550. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00871
[10] Wang F, Xu H, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Wu C (2023) Experimental study on the enhanced oil recovery mechanism of an ordinary heavy oil field by polymer flooding. ACS Omega 8(15):14089–14096. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08084
[11] Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers, vol 264. Wiley.
[12] Knight BL (1973) Reservoir stability of polymer solutions. J Pet Technol 25(5):618–626. https://doi.org/10.2118/4167-PA
[13] Cannella WJ, Huh C, Seright RS (1988) Prediction of xanthan rheology in porous media. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-18089. SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/18089-MS
[14] Tahir M, Hincapie RE, Foedisch H, Abdullah H, Ganzer L (2018) Impact of sulphates presence during application of smart water flooding combined with polymer flooding. In: SPE Europec featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition, D042S014R003. SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/190796-MS
[15] Gong H, Xu G, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Wu D, Niu M, et al (2009) Influencing factors on the properties of complex systems consisting of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide/triton X-100/cetyl trimethylammonium bromide: viscosity and dynamic interfacial tension studies. Energy Fuels 23(1):300–305. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800546t
[16] Al-Sahhaf T, Elkamel A, Suttar Ahmed A, Khan AR (2005) The influence of temperature, pressure, salinity, and surfactant concentration on the interfacial tension of the n-octane-water system. Chem Eng Commun 192(5):667–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/009864490510644
[17] Tahir M, Hincapie RE, Foedisch H, Strobel GJ, Ganzer L (2019) Potential benefits of fluid optimization for combined smart-water and polymer flooding: impact on remaining oil saturation. In: SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, D023S014R002. SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/196763-MS