Document Type : Full article


1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Hamedan University of Technology, Hamedan, Iran

2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar


In this work, an improved single-column chromatographic (ISCC) separation process is proposed. The term `improved' refers to both conceptual and physical modifications compared to the available single-column processes, including a novel fraction collection scheme and allowing overlapped peaks from adjacent cycles. Also the fraction collection mechanism was modified in order to facilitate online monitoring. Another advantage of the ISCC process is its large degree of freedom as injection volume, cycle time, solvent flow rate, feed concentration, and fraction-collection intervals can all be decision variables in this process. The experimental implementation and validation is covered in this work. The results indicate successful operation of the ISCC process and accompanying peripherals for the separation of guaifenesin enantiomers. In particular, the tests confirmed the integrity of the online monitoring system and proved the capability of the process for 98% purification of the tested enantiomers with an advantageously shorter cycle time, which results in higher productivity.


Main Subjects

[1]      Rajendran, A., Paredes, G. and Mazzotti, M., “Simulated moving bed chromatography for the separation of enantiomers”, Journal of Chromatography A, 1216 (4), 709 (2009).
[2]      Mazzotti, M., Storti, G. and Morbidelli, M., “Optimal operation of simulated moving bed units for nonlinear chromatographic separations”, Journal of Chromatography A, 769 (1), 3 (1997).
[3]      Heinonen, J., Sanlaville, Q., Niskakoski, H. and Sainio, T., “Effect of separation material particle size on pressure drop and process efficiency in continuous chromatographic separation of glucose and fructose”, Separation and Purification Technology, 193, 317 (2018).
[4]      Broughton, D. B. and Gerhold, C. G., “Continuous sorption process employing fixed bed of sorbent and moving inlets and outlets”, United States Patent And Trademark Office Granted Patent, (1961).
[5]      Colin, H., Ludemann-Hombourger, O. and Denet, F., Equipment for preparative and large size enantioselective chromatography, In: Preparative enantioselective chromatography, 1st ed., Cox, G. B. (Editor), Blackwell Publishing, Noida, India, p. 242 (2005).
[6]      Siitonen, J. and Sainio, T., “Unified design of chromatographic separation processes”, Chemical Engineering Science, 122, 436 (2015).
[7]      Schlinge, D., Scherpian, P. and Schembecker, G., “Comparison of process concepts for preparative chromatography”, Chemical Engineering Science, 65 (19), 5373 (2010).
[8]      Seidel-Morgenstern, A. and Guiochon, G., “Theoretical study of recycling in preparative chromatography”, AIChE Journal, 39 (5), 809 (1993).
[9]      Grill, C. M., “Closed-loop recycling with periodic intra-profile injection: A new binary preparative chromatographic technique”, Journal of Chromatography A, 796 (1), 359 (1998).
[10]  Kaspereit, M. and Sainio, T., “Simplified design of steady-state recycling chromatography under ideal and nonideal conditions”, Chemical Engineering Science, 66 (21), 5428 (2011).
[11]  Vanthuyne, N. and Roussel, C., Differentiation of enantiomers, Schurig, I. V. Edition, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, p. 107 (2013).
[12]  Kazi, M. K., Medi, B. and Amanullah, M., “Optimization of an improved single-column chromatographic process for the separation of enantiomers”, Journal of Chromatography A, 1231, 22 (2012).
[13]  Medi, B., Kazi, M. K. and Amanullah, M., “Experimental implementation of optimal control of an improved single-column chromatographic process for the separation of enantiomers”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 54 (25), 6527 (2015).
[14]  Medi, B., “Control and optimization of continuous chromatographic separation processes”, Ph. D. Thesis, School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, (2013).
[15]  Swagelok, “Sample Cylinders”, Available from:, (2018).
[16]  Araújo, J. M. M., Rodrigues, R. C. R., Eusebio, M. F. J. and Mota, J. P. B., “On-line enantiomeric analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography in chiral separation by simulated moving bed”, Journal of Chromatography A, 1189 (1-2), 292 (2008).
[17]  Cavazzini, A., Costa, V., Nadalini, G. and Dondi, F., “Instrumental method for automated on-line fraction analysis and peak deconvolution in multicomponent-overloaded high-performance liquid chromatography”, Journal of Chromatography A, 1137 (1), 36 (2006).
[18]  Langel, C., Grossmann, C., Morbidelli, M., Morari, M. and Mazzotti, M., “Implementation of an automated on-line high-performance liquid chromatography monitoring system for "cycle to cycle" control of simulated moving beds”, Journal of Chromatography A, 1216 (50), 8806 (2009).
[19]  Medi, B., Kazi, M. K. and Amanullah, M., “Comparison of single-column chromatography and simulated moving bed process at optimal operating points”, proceedings of AIChE Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, U.S.A., p. 630f (2011).